Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve Wright's avatar

The most incisive look into this moment of autocracy for me was Ross Douthat's interview with Marc Andreeson. Andreeson is sunlit as a little tiny, petulant, baby man who wasn't getting his way. Who wants to be seen a "a good person" and wants to do what ever feels good. Marc Benioff's recent request for the National Guard to come to San Francisco is a similar situation. A small person with a very big wallet. He wants what he wants and he is tired of not getting it. The petulance of the rich. They get to want what they want, the problem is that Capitalist Autocracy gives the the ability to TAKE it. $$$ IS the problem, not the solution.

Miguel Benasayag's little book the Tyranny of Algorithms is excellent! Venessa Machado de Oliviera's movement - Hospicing Modernity - is deeply resonant for me. The 2 book Hope Punk series, The Monk and Robot by Becky Chambers, shows a way to hold the possible futures.

I DO NOT resonate with the "be civil" movement. When you look at who is calling for civility, it is those who are comfortable and feel their boat rocking for the first time in a very real way. However, I do resonate with neighborliness of purity. It's a way of being that understands the most vile as having a life force that merits dignity, regardless of the fact that their actions and beliefs may be far from dignified. https://youtu.be/_ZtpD304AmI

Expand full comment
Farzam's avatar

Think more than anything gained a lot from NPR programming over the years; Freakonomics, On the Media, This American Life, Radio Lab to name a few. I don’t believe different aspects of our lives(economics, etc.) exist in a vacuum and crosses disciplines when it comes to content. It has made it easier to connect the dots. Noam Chomsky has been a guiding light in some aspects. And keeping up with general news. Thinking about Authoritarianism and its relationship to capital; it seems to me from recent past that capital in most part bends the knee when its under pressure for self preservation and perhaps gains through a transactional relationship. This was seen in various forms in media outlets, corporations, higher education, etc. In my mind Impact investing ultimately is the relationship between capital and altruism. As you’ve pointed out, unfortunately, in the past a $1 in impact investments hasn’t returned an equivalent value in impact; which were in normal market/political conditions (I was always curious about your thoughts on that). Question is if that would change when under duress. Human psychology, social behavior and historical precedence do offer some insight. I am pessimistic based on my research. In my opinion, and what I’ve been working on, we need to avoid such pitfalls and extend our understanding of the relationship between capital and altruism, and explore other means of application of capital to create returns, increase impact and reduce exposure to balance that relationship.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts